WWE Royal Rumble 2017: 5 Things WWE Got Wrong in Battle Royal Match

After an entertaining PPV here is a look at the five things WWE got wrong with this year’s Royal Rumble match.

The smoke has settled and the WWE welcomed fans on the road to Wrestlemania 33. Royal Rumble would set the tone and provide breathtaking moments at times. Amidst all the chaos and drama, WWE’s apex predator would leave the Alamodome as the last man standing at the winner of the 2017 Royal Rumble match.

However, that wasn’t the only historical event from the PPV. John Cena’s 16th WWE title win would cement his legacy forever in the history books of the WWE. The Raw tag team titles would also change hands. However, the prime attraction of the PPV itself would be the battle royale. As such there would be much to dissect and digest from such a star-studded match. The majority of the bout managed to please both casual and hardcore fans and would have them on the edge of their chairs towards the end.

However, no match is without its own flaws. Questions must be asked and booking decisions must be questioned. One would have to question the intentions of creative for having Reigns come in at number 30 or for him eliminating the Undertaker. Join us as we analyse the entire battle royal and come up with the top 5 things creative should have done differently.