4 Pros and Cons of the Kane vs. Seth Rollins WWE Hell in a Cell Feud

wwe.com

Con: Kane is Not a Realistic Challenger

WWE thrives off unpredictability. If they’re wondering why their ratings are suffering, it’s probably because things have been very predictable lately.

While he may not be the ideal challenger, Kane is capable of holding his own in a main event feud. The problem is he has absolutely no chance of winning the WWE World Heavyweight Championship.

A lot of people have speculated that Rollins is going to hold onto the title until at least WrestleMania, where he will then either drop the title to one of his former Shield members, or potentially retain it for a little while longer. Even if that isn’t the case, WWE needs to convince the fans that Seth could potentially lose the title to whoever he faces. Otherwise, there’s almost no point in watching.

I suppose that, to little kids, Kane is a realistic challenger. He’s big and scary, so he should be able to beat a mere mortal like Rollins. But then again, wrestling is still real to kids, so anyone could be a legitimate threat in their eyes. To the adult fan, however, we can tell whether a guy has a chance or not. Kane has no chance. WWE hasn’t invested all this time into Rollins’ title reign to have him drop the belt to a guy who is very much past his prime. And it’s unfortunate that this was also true for Sting, thus leaving the fans with two lackluster title feuds in a row.

Next: Pro #2