4 Pros and Cons of the Kane vs. Seth Rollins WWE Hell in a Cell Feud

WWE.com

Did WWE make the right call with the Kane-Rollins feud?

More from WWE

• Trish Stratus on WWE NXT would help elevate that women’s division
• Randy Orton signs with SmackDown to go after The Bloodline
• WWE and AEW will put on a full court press for Kazuchika Okada in 2024
• The Judgment Day is the top faction story in WWE
• Liv Morgan vs Rhea Ripley is perfect for WWE Royal Rumble 2024

After the Sting vs. Seth Rollins feud ended in an injury and a subsequent sloppy ending to a championship match, the last thing a lot of people wanted to see was another old guy challenging Rollins for the title. Rollins’ athleticism is certainly enough for him to carry his opponents through matches, but it’s not something that he should have to do on a regular basis.

Then, we were given Rollins vs. Kane.

ALSO ON DAILY DDT: Ranking All 30 WWE Hell in a Cell Matches

Kane, a guy has been masked an unmasked more times than John Cena has held the WWE title. Kane, a guy who hasn’t held a major championship since the World Heavyweight title in 2010, and who hasn’t held the WWE championship since 1999. Kane, a guy who is seemingly about as washed up as Brett Favre after he left the Packers. Kane, a guy whose most recent gimmick was that he was the Director of Operations of the WWE.

That is who we were given to face off against the current WWE World Heavyweight Champion.

And honestly, I think it’s great.

It seems like, overall, this feud could be a good thing for WWE. But let’s take a look and both the good and the bad as it pertains to Kane vs. Seth Rollins.

Next: Pro #1