Do We Really Need So Many Gimmick Matches in WWE?

facebooktwitterreddit

A week after multiple Halloween-themed “street fights,” WWE has advertised a Guitar on a Pole match for Raw this week. When is enough going to be enough?

When I was just a young lad, I grew up watching WWE just like the rest of my friends and family. Now, being that these were the “dark ages” (ie, 1980s – I’m old), my exposure to the then World Wrestling Federation was on the syndicated shows – Superstars, mostly, but my grandparents would let me stay up when I was over at their house to watch Prime Time Wrestling.

Someone in the family had one of those special cable boxes – you know, the ones where the “pay” in “pay per view” wasn’t necessary. So we would go over and watch pay per views there, and do you know what no one ever said? “Boy, this match is good, but how much better would it be with pumpkin guts all over the ring?”

Back then, gimmick matches existed. But the whole point of them was to be a special occasion. It’s why the Royal Rumble is so different from your run of the mill battle royal. It’s why a Survivor Series elimination tag match is different from a standard 6-, 8-, or 10-person tag match.

The other gimmick matches? Street fights, cage matches, etc? Super rare occurrences. Extra violent matches – “unsanctioned” was a big word back in the day – were supposed to be the culmination of deeply personal battles. A random episode of Raw after a couple of heads of lettuce got thrown around is not that culmination, is it?

But here we are, with WWE promoting a “Guitar on a Pole Match” this week between Elias and Jason Jordan. I don’t think you need me to tell you this is a terrible idea. But what’s worse is the over-reliance on gimmick matches of late in WWE. Just last week, it was Halloween – time to throw pumpkins in the ring and paint kendo sticks like candy corn! And in another few weeks, it’s Thanksgiving – better be ready to take plenty of cornucopias to the cranium!

More from WWE

The point is, there are too many gimmick matches going on at any one time in WWE. Every time you turn around, it’s either a street fight, or a falls count anywhere, or a tables match, or an object on a pole, or a cage match, and it’s exhausting. Trying to keep up with all of them, you can’t remember when there’s a stipulation or not. That’s usually a sign of overkill.

The really ironic part? How many gimmick matches were on the TLC pay per view? Just one. The main event was a Tables, Ladders, and Chairs match, but the rest of the card? Standard fare. This is a pay per view built on gimmicks – they even added a stairs match one year and called the show Tables, Ladders, Chairs… And Stairs!

The overuse of gimmick matches is going to eventually result in a backlash from fans. It’s been written here on this site that WWE should consider dropping match-themed pay per view events like TLC, Hell in a Cell, and Elimination Chamber. The matches are not as thrilling as they used to be, and the PG-rating prevents a lot of what made the matches special. Some superstars have found ways around those limitations – but many have not.

Next: 25 Greatest Entrance Themes in WWE History

If the matches aren’t as special as in years past, why even bother? If you want a great feud to end with a bang, you have to hold back with the spectacle until the end. A climax only works if it’s an elevation above the previous events. You can’t go higher than a highest point. Let’s pump the brakes a little bit on the gimmick matches.